PARTNERSHIP IN OPEN INNOVATIONS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE AGRICULTURAL MARKET: POLAND CASE STUDY

Article Sidebar


PDF

Published:
Dec 30, 2021
Issue
No. 26(75) (2021)
Section
Articles
CitedBy/Share
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Main Article Content

Zenon Pokojski
Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Lublin
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-6397

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/PEFIM.2021.26.75.12
Keywords : partnership, open innovation, innovation ecosystem, innovation management, knowledge transfer
Abstract
The ability to build and manage a knowledge transfer partnership is one of the most highly demanded skills. Knowledge is widely dispersed, so it should be acquired from the environment. For this purpose, partnerships should be established with different entities. Presumably, the most mature type of partnership is the innovation ecosystem. Hence empirical research was conducted among Poland’s Grupa Azoty (GA) Puławy's consortium members based on an in-depth, partially structured interview, supported by an analysis of several innovation ecosystems of chemical companies. The aim of the research was to assess the phenomenon of open innovations in the GA along with the characteristics of the selection of partners, cooperation strategies and declared resources for jointly implemented projects.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pokojski, Z. (2021). PARTNERSHIP IN OPEN INNOVATIONS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE AGRICULTURAL MARKET: POLAND CASE STUDY. The Scientific Journal European Policies, Finance and Marketing, (26(75), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.22630/PEFIM.2021.26.75.12
References

Adegbesani, J. A., & Higgins, M. J. (2010): The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 187-211. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.872 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem, Harvard Business Review, 84 (4), 98-107. Available at www.hbrreprints.org. (accessed Jan 2021).

Autio, E. & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M Gann,. & N. Phillips, Innovation management: Oxford University Press, 204-288.

Blomqvist, K. & Levy, J. (2006): Collaboration capability – a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concept and Philosophy, 2 (1), 31-48. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kirsimarja-Blomqvist/publication/ (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Chanal, V., & Caron-Fasan, M. L. (2010): The difficulties involved in developing business models open to innovation communities: the case of a crowdsourcing platform. Management, 13: 318-340. Available at https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.134.0318 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2013): Managing open innovation in large firms. Garwood Center for Corporate Innovation at California University, Berkeley in US & Fraunhofer Society in Germany. Available at http://www.iot.ntnu.no/innovation/norsi-pims-courses/chesbrough/ (accessed Jan 2021).

Chesbrough, H., Kim, S., & Agogino, A. (2014): Chez Panisse: Building an open innovation ecosystem. California Management Review, 56 (4): 144-177. Available at https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.4.144 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2018): The adoption of open innovation in large firms. Technology Management, 61: 35-45. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1399022 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014): Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5): 828-840. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Fjelstad, Ø. Snow, C. Miles, R. & Lettl, C. (2012): The architecture of collaboration, Strategic Management Journal, 33 (6), pp.734-750. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1968 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Gorton, G. B., & Souleles, N. S. (2007): Special purpose vehicles and securitization. In The risks of financial institutions (pp. 549-602). University of Chicago Press. Available at https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Gulati, R., Nohria N., & Zahher A. (2000): Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 203-215. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Herstatt, C., & Sander, J. G. (2004): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities. Wiesbaden, Gabler Verlag. [in Germany]. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84540-5 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Jackson, D. J. (2011): What is an innovation ecosystem? Arlington, National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deborah-Jackson-7/publication/266414637 (accessed Jan 2021).

Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. (2004): How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. [in]: Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities. Gabler Verlag, 2004. Available at https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/70028/von Hippel (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Laursen, K. & Salter, A. (2006). Open innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among U. K. Manufacturing Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27. Available at doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Olander, H. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. Blomqvist K. & Ritala, P. (2010). The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects, Knowledge and Process Management, 17 (4), 188-204. Available at doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.356 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Pfitzer, M. W., Bockstette, V., & Stamp, M. (2013): Innovating for shared value, Harvard Business Review, 86: 100-107.

Pokojski, Z. (2018, September): In searching for business model open for innovations on agricultural market – conceptual approach, Proceedings of the 2018 International Scientific Conference ‘Economic Sciences for Agribusiness and Rural Economy’ No 1, Warsaw, 7–8 June 2018, 237–242, Available at DOI: 10.22630/ESARE.2018.1.33. (Crossref)

Ritala, P., Armila, L., & Blomqvist, K. (2009): Innovation orchestration capability – defining the organizational and individual level determinants. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (4): 569-591. Available at https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960900242X (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Ritala, P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Nätti, S. (2012): Coordination in innovation-generating business networks – the case of Finnish mobile TV development. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27 (4): 324-334. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621211221698 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. Available at doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 (accessed Jan 2021). (Crossref)

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Recommend Articles
Licence
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in European Policies, Finance and Marketing are fully open access. In this way, the scientific research results contained in articles published in our journal are available to every reader free of charge - in accordance with the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

 

According to the CC BY-NC license you are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
  3. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Source: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en

According to that, the authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights.