IMPACT OF PANELISTS ON WIBOR RATES – HYBRID APPROACH

Main Article Content

Piotr Mielus


Keywords : financial benchmarks, money market, hybrid method
Abstract
The reform of financial benchmarks is one of the key elements of stability and trust in the financial market. In the money market, it is difficult to implement reforms because of the disappearance of the interbank deposit market, which was a reference market for IBOR-type rates. A solution is a hybrid method which combines declarations of panelists and prices of eligible transactions. Based on historic time series, the article analyses the impact of individual banks on the published index and presents the way the hybrid method can be used for WIBOR 3M. On the grounds of empirical data, the impact of particular banks was found to be moderate and the hybrid method proved to generate an interest rate series of a similar level, but of greater variance. The key problem is a limited impact of real-transaction prices on the published rate due to a low share of concluded deals and divergence of their prices from quotes generated by so called expert judgment in the analysed period.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mielus, P. (2020). IMPACT OF PANELISTS ON WIBOR RATES – HYBRID APPROACH. The Scientific Journal European Policies, Finance and Marketing, (23(72), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.22630/PEFIM.2020.23.72.10
References

Abrantes-Metz R., Kraten M., Metz A., Seow G. (2012), Libor manipulation?, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 36, no. 1, p. 136-150 (Crossref)

Brousseau V., Chailloux A., Durre A. (2013), Fixing the Fixings: What Road to a More Representative Money Market Benchmark?, IMF Working Paper No. 13/131, 29.05.2013 (Crossref)

Duffie D., Stein J. (2015), Reforming LIBOR and Other Financial Market Benchmarks, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, no. 2, Spring, p. 191-212 (Crossref)

EMMI (2017): Position Paper Setting out the Legal Grounds for the Proposed Reforms to Euribor, 8.03.2017

Gandhi P., Golez B., Jackwerth J.C., Plazzi A. (2015), Libor Manipulation: Cui Bono?, Finance Research Seminar, April 2015

GPWB (2017), Regulamin stawek referencyjnych WIBID i WIBOR, 30.11.2017

Hou D., Skeie D. (2014), LIBOR: Origins, Economics, Crisis, Scandal and Reform, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 667, March 2014 (Crossref)

Kirti D. (2017), What are reference rates for?, IMF Working Paper, WP/17/13, January 2017 (Crossref)

Mielus P. (2016), Dylematy reformy indeksów rynku finansowego, Gospodarka Narodowa, 4/2016, p. 91-114 (Crossref)

Mielus P. (2017), Vicious circle of the benchmark reform, Bezpieczny Bank, Vol. 69, No. 4, p. 108-129

Mielus P. (2018), Behavioural aspects of benchmark quotation – the WIBOR case, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica, 3(335), p. 189-205 (Crossref)

Mielus P., Mironczuk T. (2015), Structure of the cost of deposits in selected EU countries, Bezpieczny Bank 3(60), Warszawa 2015, p. 89-101 (Crossref)

Perkins J., Mortby P. (2015), Evolving financial benchmarks: The impact on legacy contracts, Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, 7.4, Autumn/Fall 2015, p. 296-304 (Crossref)

Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2016/1011 of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Recommend Articles